We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Smaller fees utilize.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Woman don't approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they could cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release being a legally regarded conviction. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
However it really is made crystal clear that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make sure respect on the family drop in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has actually been realized. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, even though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it really is actually very obscure about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your 90-day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
However it's made apparent that police is free to just take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to law. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure respect in the family shed in accordance with legislation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of your Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all performing in their Positions with DCFS.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is often a mandatory prerequisite in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law needs that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.
Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated earlier mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and the case shall be decided through the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
Any court may look for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Criminal cases In the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Unlike most civil legislation systems, common legislation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, get more info all lower courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.